A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR SELECTING PREFERRED SOLUTIONS IN MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING - CentraleSupélec Access content directly
Book Sections Year : 2012

A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR SELECTING PREFERRED SOLUTIONS IN MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING

Abstract

In multiobjective optimization problems, the identified Pareto Frontiers and Sets often contain too many solutions, which make it difficult for the decision maker to select a preferred alternative. To facilitate the selection task, decision making support tools can be used in different instances of the multiobjective optimization search to introduce preferences on the objectives or to give a condensed representation of the solutions on the Pareto Frontier, so as to offer to the decision maker a manageable picture of the solution alternatives. This paper presents a comparison of some a priori and a posteriori decision making support methods, aimed at aiding the decision maker in the selection of the preferred solutions. The considered methods are compared with respect to their application to a case study concerning the optimization of the test intervals of the components of a safety system of a nuclear power plant. The engine for the multiobjective optimization search is based on genetic algorithms.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
120226_Articolo_Springer_book_formatted.pdf (437.32 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-00771555 , version 1 (08-01-2013)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-00771555 , version 1

Cite

Enrico Zio, R. Bazzo. A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR SELECTING PREFERRED SOLUTIONS IN MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING. Cengiz Kahraman. Computational Intelligence Systems in Industrial Engineering, Springer, pp.23-43, 2012, Atlantis Computational Intelligence Systems, Vol. 6. ⟨hal-00771555⟩
163 View
712 Download

Share

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More